I AM FREE FROM CHAINS:
I went to one University
and a man raises a point that,
if he was to be me, he would have been rich and has sex with so many ladies.
His point is ok, but here is the case we are not the same. I can easily do
that, but as whether that lady is morally corrupt or not.
Before I can be able to help or give my theories to lady to pursued
high education, it has to be a trustworthy. Giving your works to ladies because
of sex or love will not earn me respect. If am to give my theories to lady to pursue
high education it should be my wife. I know those hypocrites and dishonest
people out there will say I am greedy.
To say more, people are found of locking others not to get
their desire lady to marry. Either the lock you from your desire lady or lock you from the lady who desire you. Such people are against the truth and shall not succeed
someone like me. Or a woman I love and she truly love me! The law said “every human is free to determine
his or her own goals”. I am free from those chains. Those wicket and
aimless people rather preferred you marrying a corrupt lady! We called such useless
and aimless people enemies of progress. If you are a lady or gentle man and
this happening to you, don’t loose courage: know that you are value or worthy
of riches! For Christians they are found of locking people with their mouths.
Can you imaging a gentle man who will go to Church or mosque crying to Jesus or
Mohammed, not to allow him miss a lady in his life? This trait is not only limited
to men, but also women. Others also have magic keys to lock. Most women or men
are spiritually blind and the end up marrying people whom they latter
regretted.
I also know those hypocrites and dishonest people out there
will say I am feeling pride. As I said truth
is greater than sine and there is no
power of darkness that can exceed
the power of truth! If you are an intellectual and you never knew that
these things exist, then you had no experience in life!
Truly I say to you these two theories, namely “APPLICATION OF POINT VALUES INTERVALS LAW”
and “BILLIAN INFLATION PRINCIPLE OF
LINEARITY” was hypothesized to be given to a lady who is pursuing her PhD
to publish in her name. I would have been shameful and disgrace if I truly gave
these theories to that lady! For the virginal, she will give you, but that should
not be counted as a love!
BILLIAN INFLATION
PRINCIPLE OF LINEARITY
There are many theories about the inflation. These are the “Quantity Theory”, the “Keynesian Theory”, the “Push Theory”, the “expectation Theory”, etc. All these theories are verbal theories
and are limited when it comes to measuring inflation. All nations are
particularly concerned about annually inflation than monthly inflation due to
incompetency.
The theory which I am introducing serves as measuring the
average monthly inflation and average monthly rate of return. The fisher
equation can be used to measure real rate of return because it is limited; I
have to invent my own theory to meet up today needs.
BILLIAN INFLATION PRINCIPLE:
My hypothesis states that, for every β above or below inflation I,
which is real rate of return from fix income portfolio and point α, above inflation of fix income; at
proportion of investible funds б in
fix income of portfolio, there is linearity between average monthly real rate
of return Rm in the varying
of б at any month and average
monthly inflation Im in
the varying of б at the same month.
Rm=-[б(I+β)/24(I-б)]-Im
Im=б(I+β)/24-α
[Rm, Im]=[бa*Rm,
бs*Im]
Or
[Rm, Im]=[бsRm,
бaIm]
For 0<бa<1 correspondence
to 0<бs<1
Where:
бa= 2, 3,
4,…………..,
бs=0, -1,
-2,…………..,
PARAMETERS:
I be annual
inflation
б be the
proportion of investible funds
β be the real
rate of return fix income portfolio
Im be
the monthly inflation in non-fix income portfolio
Rm be
the monthly real rate of return in non-fix income portfolio
α be points above rate of
inflation in fix income portfolio.
The requirement of the hypothesis is:
Im + Rm=[бa*Rm
+ бs*Im]/2
TABLE:
Proportion of Funds in fix incom(%)
|
Annual inflation (%)
|
Varying the proportion
inflation in non-fix income
|
Point above inflation in fix income(%)
|
Real rate of return fix
income(%)
|
Monthly Real rate of return of
in non-fix income(%)
|
Monthly inflation in non-fix income(%)
|
30
|
10
|
16.5
|
2
|
-0.75
|
1.5
|
Im=30(10+2)/24-16.5
Im=1.5%
Rm=-[30(10+2)/24(10-16.5)]-1.5
Rm=-0.75%
Applying the inflation principle of linearity, by varying 0<бa<1 correspondence
to 0<бs<1
[Rm, Im]=[(-1.5,
-2.25, -3,…,); (0, -1.5,-3,….,)]
This simply telling us that if Rm is -0.75%
then Im is 1.5%, if Rm is -1.5%
then Im is 0%, if Rm is -2.25%
then Im is -1.5%, if Rm is -3%
then Im is -3% and so on.
